What Does It Mean To Scrub An Insurance Claim?

December 29th, 2015 - David Greene, MD
Categories:   Claims   Coding   CPT® Coding   Diagnosis Coding   Insurance   Medicare   Modifiers   National Coverage Determinations (NCD)   Surgical Billing & Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

 

During the rigorous training physicians undergo to learn their craft, very little education is received on how to deal with submitting claims to insurance companies.  It’s unfortunately a necessary evil, as surgeons who contract with insurance companies rely on that reimbursement as the lifeblood for practice survival.

 

Receiving payment from insurance payers involves submitting claims after providing treatment.  Whether it’s in an office setting, emergency room, or an operating room, filing a claim involves supplying the appropriate procedure and diagnosis codes along with any appropriate modifiers pertaining to the treatment performed.  However, simply filing a claim does not assure that it will in fact be paid.

 

The policies of insurance companies for accepting or rejecting claims change often. A claim that got paid last month may be currently denied without notice depending on carrier specific modifications.  This results in a large batch of denied claims for surgeons performing many of the same procedures.  Not only is it confusing for a practice to attempt following up on these adjustments, it can result in lengthy days in accounts receivables along with rollercoaster collection periods.

 

Is there a secret weapon orthopedic surgeons can use to assist with streamlining claims to maximize acceptance?  That’s where claim “scrubbing” enters the picture.  The term “scrubbing” refers to an intricate cleaning of a claim prior to submission.  Over the past 10 years, automated claims editing has been developed which helps to validate that a claim is appropriate and accurate for submission.

 

There are two components in scrubbing claims.  As the most common error for denied claims is data entry errors, the patient demographic data is reviewed for the most common mistakes.  For instance, keying in an incorrect procedure code that is age specific would make the claim invalid, and the scrubber flags those types of errors for correction prior to submission.  This is the easy part of the automation. (Figure 1)

 

The complicated portion of scrubbing involves a thorough review of the codes and modifiers to ensure complicity with carrier specific guidelines. This is commonly referred



to as the “rules engine.”  In some fashion, every data element of the claim is analyzed. If a physician submits a claim for a hysterectomy and the scrubber sees a male gender it will obviously be flagged.  The scrubber verifies that a procedure performed is associated with a diagnosis code that justifies the medical necessity of that procedure along with variables such as gender, age, date and place of service and any required modifiers.  The complexity of scrubbing should not be underestimated.  By the time one multiplies the total number of Medicare local and national coverage determinations, along with data from the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), ICD-9 codes, and modifiers the potential numbers of editable combinations surpasses ten million. Advanced claim scrubbers, though, can review about ten claims per second.

 

By including national and local coverage determinations from all of the Medicare geographical regions in every state along with data from the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), approximately 35% of existing CPT® codes are represented as a baseline in claims editing programs.  There is no Medicare medical necessity guidelines for the remaining 65% of codes, therefore claim scrubber software companies hire clinicians and nurses who work full time evaluating up to the minute medical necessity data posted by insurance carriers around the country on their website as mandated by law. In addition, procedure codes are matched with all feasible diagnosis codes that are believed to be clinically defensible for claim acceptance. As one might expect, this is a costly endeavor so most claim scrubbing software companies license this portion from the few companies performing the research.

 

So how good are existing claim scrubbers?  There’s a wide range available, either as a standalone product or integrated with practice management software. Often the billing company utilized will incorporate a scrubber. The best ones will routinely achieve over 95% claim acceptance on the first pass. Practices who were previously performing manual edits typically find that after instituting the technology the scrubber flags over 30% of claims. This means about 30% potential claim denial prior to scrubbing, which drags out the revenue cycle. By having the scrubber flagging problem claims, changes can then be made instantly prior to submission, rather than waiting weeks for a denial.  As a result, the practice will see more reimbursement and receive those funds faster.  There will also be less back-end work secondary to denied claims.

 

Can relying on an experienced coder achieve the same acceptance rate?  In all likelihood, No.  As mentioned, scrubbers check demographic information along with the codes. Also, if a payer changes a filing guideline on its claim form or a medical necessity requirement, a certified coder would probably not be aware of it in a timely fashion.  If a surgeon is contracted with a large amount of carriers, the chances of being subjected to rejected claims increases dramatically without a way of continually monitoring these myriad and often complex requirements.

 

Embracing an advanced claim scrubber, whether directly or indirectly, will allow one’s practice to effectively combat the convoluted world of insurance claim rules and regulations.  Practices that incorporate claim scrubbing rarely move away from the process.  When the bottom line receives a significant boost along with peace of mind from knowing the latest technology is in their back pocket, why would they?

 

Dr. David Greene is a residency and fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon. He serves as the Director of Medical Relations for SilverTree Health, a full service medical insurance reimbursement company.

 

Contact information:  dgreene@silvertreehealth.com  or (877) 652-8733

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

RT and LT Modifier Usage Change (effective 2019-03-01)
May 21st, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
According to Noridian Medicare, there are new changes required when reporting the RT and LT modifier(s). In the past, it was appropriate to bill the RT and LT modifier on the same line when it was required for certain HCPCS codes. Noridian released a publication stating claims reported with RT/LT on the same ...
Do You Understand Medicare
May 21st, 2019 - Christine Taxin
Even though we may think we truly understand what it means to be a participating provider, Medicare doesn’t quite work the way that other insurance plans do. Far too many providers do not understand the difference and get into hot water. To further complicate matters, the rules are different for ...
An Update on the DHS OIG's Effort to Combat Fraud & Abuse
May 17th, 2019 - Namas
An Update on the DHS OIG's Effort to Combat Fraud & Abuse Every year, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) is required by law to release a report detailing the amounts deposited and appropriated to the Medicare Trust Fund, and the source of such ...
Prioritize Your Patient's Financial Experience
May 13th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
For many years, the ChiroCode DeskBook has emphasized the need for providers to firmly establish the patient’s financial responsibility through clear communication. We even created a “Patient Financial Responsibility Acknowledgment Form” to help providers with this process. Lately, the lack of pricing transparency has been in the news and even ...
Q/A: Two Payers Both Paid the Claim. Who Gets the Refund?
May 13th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question We have a personal injury situation where we submitted a claim was sent to the patient's auto policy carrier who refused payment. We then submitted it to her other insurance. Eventually, both companies paid her claims. Her auto paid at full value, and her secondary paid at a reduced rate ...
HIPAA Violation Penalties Revised
May 6th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On April 30, 2019 The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that “HHS will apply a different cumulative annual CMP limit for each of the four penalties tiers in the HITECH Act.” Unlike other notices which require a proposed rule with a comment period, this notice will take ...
Q/A: If Orthopedic Tests are Negative, do You List Them in Your Treatment Notes?
May 6th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: If orthopedic tests are negative, do you need to still list them in your treatment notes? Answer: Yes. Any tests which are performed by a healthcare provider, regardless of the result, should be documented in the patient record. This record is the only way that a reviewer or another provider ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association