Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

CMS Proposes to Revise Evaluation & Management Guidelines

October 26th, 2017 - BC Advantage
Categories:   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Documentation Guidelines  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

According to the recently released 2018 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, published in the Federal Register, dated July 21, 2017, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) acknowledges that the current Evaluation and Management (E/M) documentation guidelines create an administrative burden and increased audit risk for providers. In response, CMS announced its intention to undertake a multi-year effort with the input of providers and other stakeholders to revise the current E/M documentation guidelines. This revision will likely include removal of the history and exam documentation requirements.


CMS states in the provision: "Stakeholders have long maintained that both the 1995 and 1997 guidelines are administratively burdensome and outdated with respect to the practice of medicine, stating that they are too complex, ambiguous, and that they fail to distinguish meaningful differences among code levels. In general, we agree that there may be unnecessary burdens with these guidelines and that they are potentially outdated, and we believe this is especially true for the requirements for the history and the physical exam. The guidelines have not been updated to account for significant changes in technology, especially electronic health record (EHR) use, which presents challenges for data and program integrity and potential upcoding given the frequently automated selection of code level."


While CMS conducts few audits on E/M visits relative to the volume of Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) services they comprise, they have repeatedly heard from practitioners about the administrative burden. CMS states in the proposed rule that their prior attempts to revise the guidelines met with a lack of stakeholder consensus and support, which contributed to the current policy that allows practitioners to use either the 1995 guidelines or 1997 guidelines, resulting in further complexity in determining or selecting the applicable requirements.


As a result, CMS is seeking input from a broad group of stakeholders, including patient advocates, on the specific changes they should undertake to reform the guidelines, reduce the associated burden, and better align E/M coding and documentation with the current practice of medicine.


CMS stated in the proposed rule that they are specifically seeking comment on how they might focus on initial changes to the guidelines for the history and physical exam as they believe documentation for these elements may be more significantly outdated, and that differences in Medical Decision Making (MDM) are likely the most important factors in distinctions between visits of different levels. Public comment on possibly eliminating the current focus on details of history and physical exam, and allow MDM and/or time to serve as the key determinant of E/M visit level is part of the proposed rule.


To view the 2018 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule and submit comments, visit: www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/07/21/
2017-14639/medicare-program-revisions-to-paymentpolicies-under-the-physician-fee-schedule-and-otherrevisions.

Source: MAB - E-medbill.com

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Provide Proof of a Qualified Professional with QPro!
August 1st, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
QPro - Announces the Launch of an Innovative Testing Site! Innovation is paving the way once again! Unlike other certification bodies, QPro does not certify the ability to pass a test but instead verifies members qualifications are proven. Test online using real-life coding resources and coding books commonly used in the office setting. Who can Benefit ...
CMS Proposes Changes to Evaluation & Management Requirements
July 25th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
It is no secret that providers have long argued that E/M coding is burdensome and does not truly reflect the services provided. This fact is acknowledged by CMS with the following statement "Prior attempts to revise the E/M guidelines were unsuccessful or resulted in additional complexity due to lack of ...
Patients Over Paperwork?! We have Great News!
July 18th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
Spend more time with patients and less time documenting? Great Concept! Document meaningful information? Sound good? CMS is proposing just that! CMS released a new proposal July 12, 2018, focused on streamlining clinician billing and expanding access to high-quality care. The goal is to improve and restore the doctor-patient relationship, modernize Medicare ...
Understanding the Level of Preventative Services (Grades and Suggestions)
July 17th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
It is essential for providers, clinicians, and other users to understand the importance of providing preventative services.  The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommendations and has applied Grade Definitions as a suggested resource to imply the significance and strength of preventative services.  The following definitions apply to recommendations ...
Attention Providers - Please Make Time to Read this Letter
July 17th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
In an effort to show CMS is committed to changing the rules to accommodate their providers CMS released a letter to Doctors of Medicare Beneficiaries. The letter offers encouragement and a promise to reduce the burden of unnecessary rules and requirements. The letter states “President Trump has made it clear that ...
CMS Proposed New E/M Codes for Podiatry
July 16th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
According to CMS changes are coming for E/M codes.  A recent proposal from CMS stated: "The E/M visit code set is outdated and needs to be revised and revalued." Since podiatry tends to furnish a lower level of E/M visits, CMS is proposing new G-codes to report E/M office/outpatient visits. The proposed ...
Dual Medicare-Medicaid Billing Problems
July 12th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
It is important to keep in mind that Medicaid is run at a state level so there can be some differences when it comes to coverage. However, the rules regarding balance billing of covered services is set at the federal level. The law states (emphasis added): A state plan must provide ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2018 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association