Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

The Big Myth: “If it Isn’t Written, it Wasn’t Done” Documentation is NOT a Requirement for Most Medicare Claims

June 30th, 2017 - David Glaser, JD
Categories:   Audits/Auditing   Documentation Guidelines  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

This tip may contradict everything you've heard before. However, if you consider it with an open mind, you will see that it is an accurate characterization of the law, and it is also consistent with common sense. The phrase "If it isn't written, it wasn't done" is repeated so commonly that it seems crazy to question it. But with very limited exceptions, it is NOT Medicare law. When you have provided a service to a Medicare patient but find that the documentation is lacking, you can and should bill for the service, and appeal any denial of the service, unless there is a specific rule (such as the rule requiring documentation of certain medically directed anesthesia services) that requires that the service be documented.

Medicare law doesn't require documentation for all claims, it requires evidence that the service was furnished.

It is certainly true that many, if not most observers, including health lawyers and consultants act as though any lack of documentation renders a claim fraudulent or at least unbillable. This is particularly true for Evaluation and Management (E&M) services, because nearly everyone treats the E&M Documentation Guidelines as if they are a requirement. However, official publications from CMS indicate that the Guidelines are, as their name confirms, a Guideline, not a rule. In 1995, when CMS (then called the Health Care Financing Administration, or HCFA) first issued the Documentation Guidelines, they issued a question and answer sheet that asked, "Are the Documentation Guidelines required?" The answer: "No." The memo proceeded to explain that if Medicare conducts a review and determines that documentation is lacking, then the carrier is supposed to request additional information from the physician to determine whether the services were rendered. In short, the memo indicates that you determine the code based on the level of service provided by the medical professional, not by the amount of documentation. The documentation services to provide evidence that the code billed is correct, but other evidence can, and should, be considered as part of review. The memo makes it clear that the documentation becomes relevant only when there is a question as to whether the service was provided as billed.

Most Medicare carriers/Medicare Administrative Contractors ("MACs") ignore this memo. When they find documentation lacking, they do not seek additional information, they simply deny the claim. Often, they cite a Medicare statute that says, "No payment shall be made to any provider of services or other person under this part unless there has been furnished such information necessary in order to determine the amounts due such provider." Social Security Act §1833(e). The MACs typically claim that this requires you do document information in the medical record. But if you read the sentence, you can see that the law does not mention the word documentation, nor does it mention a medical record. The requirement of the law is that the provider of the service must "furnish information" necessary to demonstrate what you have done. You can comply with that statute if you can support the code you selected through testimony, a letter, or other information that supplements the information available in the medical record.

I do not mean to suggest that documentation is unimportant. If the documentation is deficient, it is going to be much more difficult to prove that the services were delivered. According to the CMS document, if Medicare performs a review and the documentation meets the guidelines, the review is closed. If the documentation is lacking, you have to convince the RAC, MAC or a Judge that the services were really provided. That will be a significant uphill battle, and can cost you both time and money. From a risk-management perspective, it is foolish to allow a significant number of claims to be submitted without documentation in the record. However, just because it is prudent to have your documentation satisfy the guideline does not mean that it is fraud to fail to meet the guidelines. When documentation is missing, you do not have to refund money on the chart as long as you reasonably believe that the service was provided as billed. In short, the Documentation Guidelines, are voluntary; not a duty.

So how do you determine whether a service was actually provided when the documentation is missing? That will appear in a future tip.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Q/A: How Many Diagnosis Codes do I use?
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: My patient has a lot of chronic conditions. Do I need to include all these on the claim? I know that I can have up to 12 diagnoses codes on a single claim. What if I need more than that? Answer: More is not always better. You only need to ...
Watch out for People-Related ‘Gotchas’
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
In Chapter 3 — Compliance of the ChiroCode DeskBook, we warn about the dangers of disgruntled people (pages 172-173). Even if we think that we are a wonderful healthcare provider and office, there are those individuals who can and will create problems. As frustrating as it may be, there are ...
Q/A: What do I do When a Medicare Patient Refuses to Sign an ABN?
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: What do I do when a Medicare patient refuses to sign an ABN? Answer: That depends on whether the patient is still demanding to have/receive the service/supply. If they aren’t demanding the service, then there is no need to force the issue. Just make sure that you still have an ...
Prepayment Review Battle Plan
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Any type of payer review can create some headaches for providers and cause problems for a healthcare office. Even for a practice that has taken administrative steps to try and prevent a prepayment review, it can still happen. A prepayment review means that you must include documentation WITH your claim. ...
Looking Ahead - Changes in Dentistry!
April 3rd, 2019 - Christine Taxin
In the next 10 years, what is the biggest change dentistry will experience? FW: We all know healthcare in the U.S. is changing rapidly. Dentistry is no exception. My opinion is that several big changes are forthcoming. Most often, I think about changes that benefit patients and/or providers. Here are three ...
Q/A: I Submitted a Claim to the VA and it’s Being Denied. Why?
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
I submitted a claim to the VA and it’s being denied. Why? There are several reasons why your claim might be denied by the Veterans Administration (VA). However, without more information about the claim itself (e.g., services billed), we can only provide the following general information about the VA and chiropractic ...
Corrections and Updates
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
One constant in our industry is change. Policies change, contracts change, and there are updates. Also, people aren’t perfect and mistakes can be made. So this article will cover a variety of topics. Published Articles We appreciate feedback from our valued customers. We have received feedback regarding two of our articles which ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association