Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

Focus Audit Results on the Documentation, Not the Encounter

June 30th, 2017 - Scott Kraft, CPC, CPMA
Categories:   Audits/Auditing  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

As an auditor, your job is to assess the quality of the documentation created by the provider to determine whether it meets the requirements to bill the code assigned to the service. This task often set us up a potentially adversarial role with the provider, particularly when it comes to sharing the results of the audit.

One of the ways in which physicians challenge the results of the audit is to go after the credentials of the auditor. Most experienced auditors have heard some version of "You're not a physician", or the question, "Where did you go to medical school?".

Often, that tension comes from the way in which the audit results are presented to the physician. We know that the documentation is the sole written record of what took place during the encounter. "If it isn't documented, it isn't done", is something we've both learned and repeated over the years.

While that may be true for purposes of documentation and code selection, it often isn't true in practice. We know that physicians often inadvertently omit components of the actual encounter from the documentation. Maybe the severity of a chronic condition that the physician saw with the patient wasn't reflected in the documentation.

Perhaps some component of the plan for an assessed condition wasn't recorded by the physicians, who was already behind on the schedule for that day. Presented with the finding that the visit itself was insufficient to support the code will often rankle physicians, who interpret it as a personal criticism of the quality of the work.

Communication such as this matters - if the physician takes umbrage at how the results are presented and becomes less receptive to the message, then the ultimate goals of an audit- to mitigate risk and improve the overall documentation of the provider - are at risk of not being met.

Consider this - when discussing the results of the audit with the physician, make it clear that our work is not a commentary on the quality of the medical care provided or of the quality of the physician-patient interaction. Many of us can attest to the quality of care furnished by the physicians we work with each day.

It's just an assessment of the documentation - an opportunity to look for the best ways to ensure that the documentation captures everything that took place during the encounter, and to ensure that the codes assigned by the physician or the practice best match the appropriate codes for the service.

We all know that sometimes, the rules of documentation can be unfair. Forget to include social history for a new patient encounter with high medical decision making, and a 99205 suddenly can't be coded as higher than a 99203. Well, as auditors we know that - our physicians aren't always in the weeds on the rules of documentation.

They're as likely to react negatively and challenge how a patient so severely ill can warrant only a level three service - if told that the visit could only achieve a 99203, rather than being told that the coding rules require that the omission of family history limit the overall credited history to 99203.

It's unfair - I tell physicians that all the time. Then we work together to determine the best ways to ensure accurate coding of encounters and capture of all appropriate documentation. After all, that's why we audit.


Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.

Latest articles:  (any category)

Q/A: How Many Diagnosis Codes do I use?
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: My patient has a lot of chronic conditions. Do I need to include all these on the claim? I know that I can have up to 12 diagnoses codes on a single claim. What if I need more than that? Answer: More is not always better. You only need to ...
Watch out for People-Related ‘Gotchas’
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
In Chapter 3 — Compliance of the ChiroCode DeskBook, we warn about the dangers of disgruntled people (pages 172-173). Even if we think that we are a wonderful healthcare provider and office, there are those individuals who can and will create problems. As frustrating as it may be, there are ...
Q/A: What do I do When a Medicare Patient Refuses to Sign an ABN?
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: What do I do when a Medicare patient refuses to sign an ABN? Answer: That depends on whether the patient is still demanding to have/receive the service/supply. If they aren’t demanding the service, then there is no need to force the issue. Just make sure that you still have an ...
Prepayment Review Battle Plan
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Any type of payer review can create some headaches for providers and cause problems for a healthcare office. Even for a practice that has taken administrative steps to try and prevent a prepayment review, it can still happen. A prepayment review means that you must include documentation WITH your claim. ...
Looking Ahead - Changes in Dentistry!
April 3rd, 2019 - Christine Taxin
In the next 10 years, what is the biggest change dentistry will experience? FW: We all know healthcare in the U.S. is changing rapidly. Dentistry is no exception. My opinion is that several big changes are forthcoming. Most often, I think about changes that benefit patients and/or providers. Here are three ...
Q/A: I Submitted a Claim to the VA and it’s Being Denied. Why?
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
I submitted a claim to the VA and it’s being denied. Why? There are several reasons why your claim might be denied by the Veterans Administration (VA). However, without more information about the claim itself (e.g., services billed), we can only provide the following general information about the VA and chiropractic ...
Corrections and Updates
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
One constant in our industry is change. Policies change, contracts change, and there are updates. Also, people aren’t perfect and mistakes can be made. So this article will cover a variety of topics. Published Articles We appreciate feedback from our valued customers. We have received feedback regarding two of our articles which ...

About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association