Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

E/M Profiles

January 29th, 2009 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Coding   Evaluation & Management (E/M)  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

CMS and other payers collect data on the utilization of E/M services within each category of service. For example, for all of the established patient visits billed using codes 99211 to 99215 by Rheumatologists, CMS keeps track of what percentage are level one’s, level two’s, level three’s, level four’s, and level five’s, within each category for each specialty designation. CMS publishes this data in raw form on its web site. It is national data, which can be analyzed on a state-by-state basis for those so inclined. The data is also available nationally in easy to use form from certain commercial vendors.

Why is it important for physicians to think about their coding distribution? It is important for two reasons:  For many physicians, the E/M services make up a high percentage of their total revenue. Coding services at too low a level is a significant revenue loss.  Second, compliance is a huge issue for physician practices. Coding services at a higher level than documented puts them at risk for a payer audit and the possibility of returning money to the government or to the payer. 

Physicians should compare their profile quarterly or biannually with their own older profile, with the profile of other physicians of their same specialty in their practice, and with the national norms. Variation from the norm, although not a problem in and of itself, should get the attention of the physician in the practice.

In general, never bill all of your services at one level within any one category. If you are a nursing home physician, for example, do not bill all of your services as a level two nursing home visit, 99308. The profile that is most likely to get the notice of your carrier is when all services in any one category are billed at one level.

After comparing each physician's profile with the profiles of the other physicians in the group and with the CMS norm, take some time to think about any variations and the reasons for the variations.  For example, if a physician works in a walk-in clinic, they may have more lower level visits than others in their specialty.  A physician whose patients are older may have more high level visits. 

Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners are compared with all other Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners.  They are not divided by specialty.

Some physician practices differ from others, and there are good reasons for a variation in the norm.   If the physician is significantly under billing, there is the opportunity for a revenue gain.  If a physician is over-reporting their services this is a compliance risk. In both cases, education is important. 

Finally, Medicare states this in their claims processing manual: 

Medical necessity of a service is the overarching criterion for payment in addition to the individual requirements of a CPT® code.  It would not be medically necessary or appropriate to bill a higher level of evaluation and management service when a lower level of service is warranted.  The volume of documentation should not be the primary influence upon which a specific level of service is billed. Documentation should support the level of service reported.  The service should be documented during, or as soon as practicable after it is provided in order to maintain an accurate medical record.


Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.

Latest articles:  (any category)

HHS Proposes Significant Changes to Patient Access Rules
February 11th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
In a significant announcement on February 11, 2019, HHS proposed new rules aimed at improving interoperability of electronic health information. This announcement was made in support of the MyHealthEData initiative which was announced by the Trump administration on March 6, 2018. The goal of that initiative was to break down ...
Charging Missed Appointment Fees for Medicare Patients
February 7th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Some providers mistakenly think that they cannot bill a missed appointment fee for Medicare beneficiaries. You can, but Medicare has specific rules that must be followed. These rules are outlined in the Medicare Claims Policy Manual, Chapter 1, Section 30.3.13. You must have an official “Missed Appointment Policy” which is ...
Q/A: Do Digital X-rays Have Their Own Codes?
February 7th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question Are you aware if digital x-ray of the spine requires a different code than plain x-ray? If so, where can I find the information specific to digital x-ray codes? Answer There are no separate codes for digital x-rays. However, there may be modifiers that are required to be submitted with the usual ...
Clinical Staff vs Healthcare Professional
February 5th, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
State scope of practice laws and regulations will help determine who is considered Clinical staff and Other qualified Health Care professionals.  Physician or other qualified healthcare professionals:  Must have a State license, education training showing qualifications as well as facility privileges.  Examples of Qualified Healthcare professionals: (NOTE: this list is not all-inclusive, please refer to your payer ...
BC Advantage Now Offering Q-Pro CEUs!
February 5th, 2019 - Find-A-Code
We are excited to announce BC Advantage is now offering Q-Pro CEUs! It is now even easier to get your QPro CEUs and stay current with BC Advantage: offering news, CEUs, webinars and more. BC Advantage is the largest independent resource provider in the industry for Medical Coders, Medical Billers,...
Attestations Teaching Physicians vs Split Shared Visits
February 1st, 2019 - BC Advantage
Physicians often use the term "attestation" to refer to any kind of statement they insert into a progress note for an encounter involving work by a resident, non-physician practitioner (NPP), or scribe. However, for compliance and documentation purposes, "attestation" has a specific meaning and there are distinct requirements for what ...
Q/A: Can I Bill a Review of X-Rays?
February 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research & Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CMHP, CST, MA, MT
It is not unusual for a healthcare provider to review x-rays taken and professionally read by another entity. Questions arise regarding how to bill this second review. It is essential to keep in mind that the global (complete) service of taking an x-ray is composed of both a professional and ...

About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association