Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

Auditing the exam 1995 Guidelines

February 11th, 2009 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Audits/Auditing   Coding   Evaluation & Management (E/M)  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Auditors breathed a huge sigh of relief when the 1997 Guidelines were released. The exam component was specific, clear and defensible in all four areas: problem focused, expanded problem focused, detailed and comprehensive. There were even specific instructions for single specialy exam elements.  Auditors celebrated.

Physicians of some specialties, did too. The single specialty exams for Psych, eye, ENT and some others fit the bill.  For many physicians, however, using the 1997 single specialty exam meant adding in more detail than they did before, and thus increased time and resources.

Any clinician is still allowed to use whichever set of Documentation Guidelines are more beneficial to them as the clinician, and payers are required to use either set, as well. 

This article is about the 1995 exam.  We know that exam is only one component of an E/M service.  Review the other articles about auditing in Codapedia.  The articles are broken up by topic, but all work together.  

The 1995 exam, like the 1997 exam, has four levels:  problem focused, expanded problem focused, detailed and comprehensive.  Here is how they are defined exactly from the 1995 Documentation Guidelines: (Highlights, italics are mine)

B. DOCUMENTATION OF EXAMINATION
The levels of E/M services are based on four types of examination that are defined as follows:
• Problem Focused -- a limited examination of the affected body area or organ system.
• Expanded Problem Focused -- a limited examination of the affected body area or organ
system and other symptomatic or related organ system(s).

• Detailed --
an extended examination of the affected body area(s) and other symptomatic
or related organ system(s).

• Comprehensive -- a general multi-system examination or complete examination of a
single organ system.

!DG: The medical record for a general multi-system examination should include
findings about 8 or more of the 12 organ systems.

For purposes of examination, the following body areas are recognized:
•  Head, including the face
•  Neck
•  Chest, including breasts and axillae
•  Abdomen
•  Genitalia, groin, buttocks
•  Back, including spine
•  Each extremity

For purposes of examination, the following organ systems are recognized:
•  Constitutional (e.g., vital signs, general appearance)
•  Eyes
•  Ears, nose, mouth and throat
•  Cardiovascular
•  Respiratory
•  Gastrointestinal
•  Genitourinary
•  Musculoskeletal
•  Skin
•  Neurologic
•  Psychiatric
•  Hematologic/lymphatic/immunologic

A problem focused exam is easy: it is a limited exam of the affected body area or organ system.  One exam element from either the list of body areas or organ systems.

A multi-system comprehensive exam is easy, too: it is an exam of 8 or more organ systems (not body areas.)

The difficulty is in differentiating between an expanded problem focused exam and a detailed exam.  First, no numbers of elements are listed in the Guidelines.  Both an expanded problem focused exam and a detailed exam are 2-7 body parts/organ systems by a strict reading of the Guidelines.  An expanded problem focused exam is a limited exam of the affected body area or organ
system and other symptomatic or related organ system(s) and a detailed exam is an extended exam of the affected body area or organ system and other symptomatic or related organ systems(s).  

What is the difference between the two?  The difference between a limited and an extended exam.   What is the difference between a limited and an extended exam?  Not defined by the Documentation Guidelines.  How do you audit in that case?

My colleague and friend, Barb Pierce, won't use the 1995 guidelines to differentiate between an expanded problem focused and detailed exam.  At her terrific auditing workshops, she says that it's just to gray to defend  in an audit, and if she can't make a comprehensive, eight organ system exam, but it's more than a problem focused exam, she switches to the 1997 Guidelines.  This is a reasonable, conservative approach.

Some groups and some payers use 2-4 body areas and/or organ systems for the EPF and 5-7 body areas and/or organ systems.  If you elect to do this, make sure your own carrier uses this distinction.  This distinction leaves very little difference in the exam, and makes if very easy to get a detailed exam.

Some auditors try to define the difference between a limited and extended exam, and write that down as a policy for their auditors to follow. 

The difference between these two levels often makes the difference in  the code selected.  If there is too much variability or subjectivity in the auditing, the audit becomes less reliable.  Do you audit the exam the same way every time?  Do all auditors in your department do that?  Using Barb Pierce's method will certainly increase the reliability of your audits, when the exam is between  EPF and Detailed.

The multi-specialty 1995 exam is easy: 8 organ systems examined, in whatever detail the clinician finds clinically relevant.

The single specialty 1995 exam is defined as: "a complete examination of a single organ system."  There's no help in the Guidelines as to what makes up a complete examination of a single organ system.  Some groups set their own guidelines before the 1997 Guidelines were released.  However, now that CMS and the AMA have agreed on a single specialty exams, I would be very cautious about a home grown policy.  If you are using a single specialty exam, use the 1997 ones, which are explicit and clear.

 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Q/A: How Many Diagnosis Codes do I use?
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: My patient has a lot of chronic conditions. Do I need to include all these on the claim? I know that I can have up to 12 diagnoses codes on a single claim. What if I need more than that? Answer: More is not always better. You only need to ...
Watch out for People-Related ‘Gotchas’
April 15th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
In Chapter 3 — Compliance of the ChiroCode DeskBook, we warn about the dangers of disgruntled people (pages 172-173). Even if we think that we are a wonderful healthcare provider and office, there are those individuals who can and will create problems. As frustrating as it may be, there are ...
Q/A: What do I do When a Medicare Patient Refuses to Sign an ABN?
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: What do I do when a Medicare patient refuses to sign an ABN? Answer: That depends on whether the patient is still demanding to have/receive the service/supply. If they aren’t demanding the service, then there is no need to force the issue. Just make sure that you still have an ...
Prepayment Review Battle Plan
April 8th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Any type of payer review can create some headaches for providers and cause problems for a healthcare office. Even for a practice that has taken administrative steps to try and prevent a prepayment review, it can still happen. A prepayment review means that you must include documentation WITH your claim. ...
Looking Ahead - Changes in Dentistry!
April 3rd, 2019 - Christine Taxin
In the next 10 years, what is the biggest change dentistry will experience? FW: We all know healthcare in the U.S. is changing rapidly. Dentistry is no exception. My opinion is that several big changes are forthcoming. Most often, I think about changes that benefit patients and/or providers. Here are three ...
Q/A: I Submitted a Claim to the VA and it’s Being Denied. Why?
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
I submitted a claim to the VA and it’s being denied. Why? There are several reasons why your claim might be denied by the Veterans Administration (VA). However, without more information about the claim itself (e.g., services billed), we can only provide the following general information about the VA and chiropractic ...
Corrections and Updates
April 1st, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
One constant in our industry is change. Policies change, contracts change, and there are updates. Also, people aren’t perfect and mistakes can be made. So this article will cover a variety of topics. Published Articles We appreciate feedback from our valued customers. We have received feedback regarding two of our articles which ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association