PSAVE Pilot Program - What Does it Mean to You?

August 20th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Categories:   Medicare   Audits/Auditing   Practice Management  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Noridian, the Jurisdiction F Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), recently announced that they will be extending their pilot program: Provider Self-Audit with Validation and Extrapolation (PSAVE). Whenever a program is extended, that means that it has been successful for the payer, which likely means that they are saving money. It doesn’t state precisely HOW they are saving money. Historically, when a pilot program is proven to be successful, it isn’t too long before other MACs follow. Before signing up to participate, providers need to carefully evaluate the program.

What is PSAVE?

According to Noridian, “The PSAVE program allows the provider to perform a self-audit after agreeing to waive appeal rights on the universe of claims.” In exchange for waiving their appeal rights, the provider receives immunity from MAC and Recovery Auditor (RA) reviews.

Providers who voluntarily participate in PSAVE receive education on how to perform a self-audit. Noridian then validates the provider's self-audit findings on a subsample of claims. Here’s the catch, based on their findings, they “will extrapolate overpayments or correct underpayments.” The correcting underpayments is nice for the provider, but the extrapolation of underpayments process has been proven to be very costly to providers. CLICK HERE to read more about extrapolation.

According to the Noridian appeals waiver form (emphasis added), “It is important to note that the validation review may result in additional overpayments identified that may have been missed by the provider when the self-audit was conducted.”

Who May Participate?

Invitations to participate were sent to providers who were considered ‘outliers’ by Noridian. This means that their billing practices were already considered questionable. If you were invited, chances are that the self-audit may not prove to be a good option for your practice.

Participation Pros and Cons

Pros

Immunity from MAC and RA reviews could be a significant benefit if your claims are problematic. However, it is essential to note that immunity does NOT extend to Unified Program Integrity Contractor (UPIC) / Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) or the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) so that immunity might not be as valuable as you think it is.

The educational aspects could prove to be beneficial to the practice by providing them with instructions to improve their claims and documentation process.

Cons

Waiving your appeals rights could be problematic, especially in situations like we are currently experiencing with the physical therapy denials by several Blue Cross organizations (e.g., Illinois, Texas).

Participation means that the practice will, in most cases, be unable to dispute the findings of the MAC. This is a pretty significant right to give up.

As mentioned earlier, immunity does not extend to all offices/organizations and their audits, so it’s value may be minimal.

Summary

Self-audits are a very good idea. However, we have some concerns about waiving your appeal rights. Rather than wait for a payer to tell you what you are doing wrong, find out yourself with your own self-audit and internally fix the problems immediately.

Note: Information about performing self-audits can be found in Chapter 3 of one of our specialty-specific Reimbursement Guides.

If you are invited to participate in PSAVE in the future, let that be a warning to you that your practice is already being considered for an audit. It should be a wake up call to ensure that your documentation and claims processes are in order.

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

RT and LT Modifier Usage Change (effective 2019-03-01)
May 21st, 2019 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
According to Noridian Medicare, there are new changes required when reporting the RT and LT modifier(s). In the past, it was appropriate to bill the RT and LT modifier on the same line when it was required for certain HCPCS codes. Noridian released a publication stating claims reported with RT/LT on the same ...
Do You Understand Medicare
May 21st, 2019 - Christine Taxin
Even though we may think we truly understand what it means to be a participating provider, Medicare doesn’t quite work the way that other insurance plans do. Far too many providers do not understand the difference and get into hot water. To further complicate matters, the rules are different for ...
An Update on the DHS OIG's Effort to Combat Fraud & Abuse
May 17th, 2019 - Namas
An Update on the DHS OIG's Effort to Combat Fraud & Abuse Every year, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) is required by law to release a report detailing the amounts deposited and appropriated to the Medicare Trust Fund, and the source of such ...
Prioritize Your Patient's Financial Experience
May 13th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
For many years, the ChiroCode DeskBook has emphasized the need for providers to firmly establish the patient’s financial responsibility through clear communication. We even created a “Patient Financial Responsibility Acknowledgment Form” to help providers with this process. Lately, the lack of pricing transparency has been in the news and even ...
Q/A: Two Payers Both Paid the Claim. Who Gets the Refund?
May 13th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question We have a personal injury situation where we submitted a claim was sent to the patient's auto policy carrier who refused payment. We then submitted it to her other insurance. Eventually, both companies paid her claims. Her auto paid at full value, and her secondary paid at a reduced rate ...
HIPAA Violation Penalties Revised
May 6th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
On April 30, 2019 The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that “HHS will apply a different cumulative annual CMP limit for each of the four penalties tiers in the HITECH Act.” Unlike other notices which require a proposed rule with a comment period, this notice will take ...
Q/A: If Orthopedic Tests are Negative, do You List Them in Your Treatment Notes?
May 6th, 2019 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: If orthopedic tests are negative, do you need to still list them in your treatment notes? Answer: Yes. Any tests which are performed by a healthcare provider, regardless of the result, should be documented in the patient record. This record is the only way that a reviewer or another provider ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2019 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association