Codapedia is now a division of Find-A-Code

Cloned E/M notes

December 29th, 2015 - Codapedia Editor
Categories:   Compliance   Evaluation & Management (E/M)   Medicare   Office of Inspector General (OIG)  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

Have you ever read a physician office note and thought it was strangely familiar?  Or, not just familiar but identical to another note? Well, Medicare contractors have noticed the same thing, and the Office of Inspector General has included this on their 2011 Work Plan.

 Medicare contractors have noted an increased frequency of medical records with identical documentation across services.  We will also review multiple E&M services for the same providers and beneficiaries to identify electronic health records (EHR) documentation practices associated with potentially improper payments.  

Electronic health records (EHRs) have made it possible to copy and paste documentation from a previous visit, performed by the same or different provider.  It is easy to “bring forward” history, exam and assessments and plans documented at a previous note.  Sometimes, the record will say, “Reviewed, no changes required,” and sometimes, these sections are just dropped into the note, as if recorded on this day’s visit.  Clinicians must and should take advantage of the historical data stored in the medical record, and use shortcuts to save time.  However, only certain types of data should be carried forward into a progress note and with limitations.

 What’s the problem with copy and paste?  There are both clinical and compliance concerns with copy and paste.  Clinically, copying the history of the present illness from a previous visit performed by the same or different provider is inaccurate.  The history of the present illness should include the reason for today’s visit and a description of the patient’s symptoms since the last visit.  The HPI elements include location, severity, duration, quality, timing, context, modifying factors and associated signs and symptoms.  That is, how is the patient doing since last seen?  Is the treatment helping?  What does the patient say is the problem or reason for the visit?  This section of the note is unique to the present visit, and may never be copied and pasted from a previous note performed by that provider or another provider.

 The HPI and ROS contradict one another  This is a problem when the clinician enters a description of the patient’s problems, but the review of systems is either clicked as “normal” or copied from a previous visit when the patient did not have that complaint.  This is a too common problem in progress notes documented using an EHR.  It not only provides a confusing clinical picture for other physicians and providers who will treat the patient, it calls into question the validity of the entire history section.

 It just doesn’t make sense  For some notes, when the history section is copied from a previous note, the description of the patient’s symptoms and the timing just doesn’t make sense.  This is particularly true when copied from another clinician’s note or if a long time period has elapsed.

 But, can’t a clinician use the past medical history?  Yes, there is no reason that the past medical, social and family history cannot be carried forward from a previous note, as long as the provider reviews it with the patient.  This is a good use of an electronic health record.  Some specialties, such as oncology or cardiology, describe the course of the patient’s treatment since diagnosis, and include this in the HPI section.  Since the course of the treatment hasn’t changed, they want to copy it from a previous note.  Here’s how that looks:  “Patient diagnosed in 2008, with cell type XYZ, treated with radiation and three rounds of chemo. Then, in 2009….”  This historical data doesn’t change from visit to visit, and may be copied into any section the physician desires: the HPI or the past medical history.  (Auditors will count it as past medical history.)  However, in addition, the clinician should document the patient’s symptoms (or lack of symptoms) since last seen.  Are there side effects of treatment?  How is the patient feeling? Those are the elements of the history of the present illness, which may not be copied and brought forward from a previous note.

 Family history reviewed, unchanged   Great, if the clinician has done so.  But, if the section labeled family history is empty, what did the clinician review?  It calls into question the validity of all of the copied note.

 What about populating today’s note with the information from the last visit, to save time, and just updating it?   Dangerous.  Of course it is time saving, but it is too easy to forget to update or change one part.  I strongly urge clinicians not to populate today’s note with the information from the last visit.

 Guard against cloned notes in your practice.  If some part of the history is used from a previous visit, the provider must review it with the patient, and indicate that it is unchanged.  The Documentation Guidelines don’t give credit for “clicking” on reviewed.  The Guidelines state the history doesn’t have to be re-documented, not that the work doesn’t need to be done.  

 

 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

Finalized Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records Regulations
August 31st, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
In January, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued updates to the privacy regulations regarding the confidentiality of patient information of substance use disorder patients (42 CFR Part 2).  This notice included references to better alignment with HIPAA regulations, but did state that Part 2 is more protective ...
Pricing for ASC’s and APC’s
August 27th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme, QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
For Medicare purposes, an Ambulatory Surgical Center Resources (ASC) is a distinct entity that operates exclusively to furnish surgical services to patients who do not require hospitalization and in which the expected duration of services does not exceed 24 hours following admission. ASC payment groups determine the amount that...
PSAVE Pilot Program - What Does it Mean to You?
August 20th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Noridian's pilot program Provider Self-Audit with Validation and Extrapolation (PSAVE) has been extended which means that it has been successful for the payer, which means that they are saving money. Historically, when a pilot program is proven to be successful, it isn’t too long before other MACs follow. Before signing up to participate, providers need to carefully evaluate the program. Are the benefits worth the costs?
Importance of Depression Screenings
August 16th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Why would a chiropractor be concerned about depression screenings when you aren’t trained to be a mental health provider? The answer lies in patient outcomes. Many quality care organizations recommend depression screenings for patients with a chronic condition. According to The National Institute of Mental Health, “People with other chronic ...
Using Modifiers 96 and 97
August 16th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires coverage of certain essential health benefits (EHBs), two of which are rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices. Since the ACA did not define these terms or specify coverage requirements, it is left up to individual states to create benchmark plans to determine coverage requirements. ...
Medicare Timed Codes Guidelines
August 16th, 2018 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Medicare's guidelines for reporting of timed codes is found in Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 5, Section 20.2. Also known as the '8 minute' rule, it describes how to calculate time for appropriate reporting when more than one timed code is performed at the same time. It should be noted that while ...
QPro’s First Annual QPro Con
August 15th, 2018 - Chris Woolstenhulme QCC, CMCS, CPC, CMRS
Date: October 9-10 Time: 9-3 MST QPro Con is featuring a virtual event with keynote speakers and experts with years of hands-on experience in the healthcare industry. Stay ahead of the changes and keep informed of important information that affects the healthcare community. Attendees receive 12 FREE CEUs with the purchase ...



About Codapedia & Find-A-Code Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

Codapedia™/Find-A-Code™ - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain) - Fax (801) 770-4428

Copyright © 2009-2018 Find A Code, LLC - CPT® copyright American Medical Association