Modifier 52 vs. 53

December 29th, 2015 - Seth Canterbury, CPC, ACS-EM
Categories:   Coding   CPT® Coding   Modifiers   Surgical Billing & Coding  
0 Votes - Sign in to vote or comment.

 

So you’ve read the descriptions for both Modifiers 52 and 53, but you’re still on the fence as to which one is appropriate for a certain surgical case. This brief article will try to better differentiate between these two often-confused modifiers.
 
Modifier 53 is appropriate when a procedure is discontinued due to “an extenuating circumstance or one that threatens the well-being of the patient,” and this physician decision always happens after the procedure has begun in cases where Modifier 53 is appropriate. Often times the decision is made so early in the procedure that only an initial incision has been made but no specific work (as stated in the description of the code that was to have been used) has been accomplished. A re-scheduling of the entire procedure will often be necessary once the reason for the termination is evaluated and resolved, as the original reason for the surgery still exists and still needs surgical treatment.
 
Modifier 52 is used when a physician elects to partially reduce or eliminate a procedure, often (but not always) making this decision before the procedure has even begun. However, something (usually the majority of the work included in the description of the code) is still accomplished in situations where Modifier 52 is appropriate. In some cases, performance of the “reduced” or “eliminated” portion may be done at a later surgery. In other cases, this omitted portion of the service will not be performed at a subsequent operation. Performance of the omitted portion may not be possible because the structure is no longer present (was previously excised) or it is not simply not medically necessary to do this portion of the service.
 
Here’s where it can get a bit confusing: It is possible that a decision could be made by the physician mid-procedure, after doing the majority of the work described by a code, to “eliminate” what was to have been the final part or a procedure, essentially “discontinuing” a surgery before accomplishing all of the work listed in the code description, and this is where some question whether Modifier 53 should appropriately be reported instead of 52. However, a physician electing to eliminate the last portion of a procedure for a reason other than an extenuating circumstance/one that threatens the well-being of a patient should still be coded with Modifier 52, notwithstanding the fact that this decision to “eliminate” a portion of the service could constitute a “discontinuation” in a certain sense of the word.
 

###

Questions, comments?

If you have questions or comments about this article please contact us.  Comments that provide additional related information may be added here by our Editors.


Latest articles:  (any category)

A 2020 Radiology Coding Change You Need To Know
February 10th, 2020 - Aimee Wilcox, CPMA, CCS-P, CST, MA, MT, Director of Content
The radiology section of the 2020 CPT© has 1 new, 18 revised, and 14 deleted codes. Interestingly, six of the 14 deleted codes were specific to reporting single-photon computerized tomographic (SPECT) imaging services of the brain, heart, liver, bladder, and others. If your organization reports radiology services, it is...
Documenting telephone calls at your dental practice is just as important as documenting patient visits.
February 4th, 2020 - Christine Taxin
Documenting telephone calls at your dental practice is just as important as documenting patient visits. Similar to other documentation, the common rule when it comes to call documentation is that if it is not documented, it did not happen. Therefore, every clinically relevant telephone call should be documented. Clinically relevant calls ...
CPT 10-Year Historical Content - Now Available!
January 22nd, 2020 - Find-A-Code
Did You Know? We now offer Historical CPT Content in 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year options! Utilize access to specific CPT historical data for previous years using rules effective at that specific time. If you’ve added UCR fees to your account, you can use Historical CPT Content to view UCR fees from ...
Inadequate Exclusion Screenings Could Put Your Practice at Risk
January 21st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Exclusion screenings require far more than just checking a name on a federal database at the time you are hiring someone. Far too many providers don’t realize that in order to meet compliance requirements, there is MUCH more involved. There are actually over 40 exclusion screening databases/lists that need to be checked.
Q/A: How do we Bill Massage Services?
January 21st, 2020 - Wyn Staheli, Director of Research
Question: We are adding a massage therapist soon and have some questions about billing their services.
Billing for Telemedicine in Chiropractic
January 14th, 2020 - Evan M. Gwilliam DC MBA BS CPC CCPC QCC CPC-I MCS-P CPMA CMHP
Many large private payers recognize the potential cost savings and improved health outcomes that telemedicine can help achieve, therefore they are often willing to cover it. While there are several considerations, there could be certain circumstances where telemedicine might apply to chiropractic care.
Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment
January 14th, 2020 - Christine Taxin
AAP treatment guidelines stress that periodontal health should be achieved in the least invasive and most cost-effective manner. This is often accomplished through non-surgical periodontal treatment.Non-surgical periodontal treatment does have its limitations. When it does not achieve periodontal health, surgery may be indicated to restore periodontal health.SCALING AND ROOT PLANINGScaling ...



About Codapedia by innoviHealth® Contact Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertise with Us

innoviHealth® - 62 E 300 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 - Phone 801-770-4203 (9-5 Mountain)

Copyright © 2000-2020 innoviHealth Systems®, Inc. - CPT® copyright American Medical Association